NEW STEP BY STEP MAP FOR H4831SC

New Step by Step Map For h4831sc

New Step by Step Map For h4831sc

Blog Article

H1000 is on my would like listing of powders at the same time. Probably the IMR Enduron collection will be well preferred and I'm able to transfer to that for superior availability.

They're precisely the same detail, but H4831 sc is cut shorter so it will eventually pack into a case less difficult then the conventional, and sometimes like our 7mm rem mag it lets us to incorporate far more powder then just the conventional H4831.

What is actually the primary difference? Compression. With no Extraordinary/major compression connected to the extensive grain 7828, the tension curve was altered and the load fell aside.

Using the 154 grain Hornady SP while in the 280, H4831 gave me superior teams and good velocity, but Rottweil R905 includes a appreciably bigger velocity and gives marginally superior precision. With Swift a hundred and fifty grain Sciroccos during the 7mm RM, H4831SC gave excellent precision and velocity, but RL22 was marginally better. For that reason, in Just about every of such scenarios I went with A further powder, but I will surely despise to divest myself of the H4831.

INgunner54 explained: It has been a bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to test. Discovered a node and shot some groups.

Apache Jct Fantastic data, I have jars of equally and constantly questioned if they might be reloaded Along with the similar recipes really should I operate out of 1 or one other.

I have made use of each and utilised the very same rates and have not been in a position to explain to any noticable discrepancies h4831sc load data with performance. the SC Model meters a little bit smoother is about all. any comments??

excaliber reported: I've found the precise opposite to become legitimate in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with one hundred eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably quicker and equally exact powder in my 300 Get Mag.

You might both: 1) Keep on and possess the firearm(s) detailed down below routinely faraway from your buying cart:

The 55grs is everything I shoot from my swift. Other manuals I feel that they have slowed down the swift to point out that their rifles are greater. It bug the hell out of me. I'm sure improved. This is exactly why I don't at any time throw out my more mature manuals. I do buy new handbook on a regular basis to remain up on new chambers and there loading. I use this 39grs in summers @ a hundred+ degrees with no issues.

Kansas Metropolis, MO I would get whatever is on the market at the moment. I’ve used equally although with my drop by load and didn’t see anything at all different functionality wise.

Soon after looking at this article (and many Other individuals, but this one particular is considered the most data pushed with a number of accredited shooters) I've stopped worrying about touching or getting in a magical distance in the lands, h4831sc and began loading the place I could optimize several elements of a load. Just my .02, hopefully you can find a thing to work for ya.

Southwest Idaho I attempted H4831sc in my 300 WM but had significantly better velocity and accuracy with H1000. I'd relatively utilize a slower burning powder with 215g tablets.

The fact that the H4831 is in truth a slower burning powder is exactly why you're looking at increased velocities acquired with that powder, as opposed to Anything you've witnessed With all the IMR h4831sc load data things.

Report this page